Source: The Yes Chronicles
http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Concert/8459/yes.html
Review: YES
Author Unknown
"We didn’t have a strong musical heritage of rock or R&B, so we just took
the whole thing and messed it up a lot." -- Bill Bruford, from the Yesyears
video (1991)
"At the beginning of 1969, I was asked … to pick two groups who I thought
would make it in the following year. One of my choices was Led Zeppelin. …
The other was Yes. … There was life, virility, and musicianship in their
approach. They had a superior vocal sound--assured, clear, and harmonic.
They knew what they were doing and did it with style. It showed in their
own songs and imaginative arrangements." -- Tony Wilson of Melody Maker,
from the back cover of Yes (1969)
"We only ever disagreed. We could never agree on anything, which is why the
music came out so funny."
-- Bill Bruford, Yesyears (1991)
Yes
Atlantic
1969
Rating: ***
Best song: "Beyond and Before"
Produced by Paul Clay and Yes
Engineer: Gerald Chevin
Cover (UK) by Haig Adishian
Personnel:
Jon Anderson: vocals, percussion
Peter Banks: guitars, vocals
Chris Squire: bass, vocals
Tony Kaye: keyboards
Bill Bruford: percussion
Track listing:
Beyond and Before
I See You
Yesterday and Today
Looking
Around
Harold Land
Every Little Thing
Sweetness
Survival
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
When Jon Anderson and Chris Squire began Yes in 1968, they envisioned a
band that would showcase both lush vocal harmonies and top-notch
musicianship. On Yes, their debut album, the vocal harmonies are in full
force, most notably on the opening piece, "Beyond and Before," with
Anderson’s unique, smooth countertenor voice leading the charge. (It bears
noting that Anderson's vocal pitch is often described as "falsetto" or even
"soprano." Since his voice has a naturally high range, and since he is
certainly not a woman, neither term is accurate!) But the music, while
compelling in spots, still needed to be honed a little to reach the heights
that other "serious" bands of the time (most notably King Crimson and the
Nice) had achieved. However, it’s worth noting that throughout their
career, Yes has never quite achieved that original balance it strove for,
as quality musicianship would soon take precedence over the vocal harmonies.
The seed of that musicianship which would soon become the band’s focus is
heard on Yes primarily from the rhythm section of Squire, on bass, and Bill
Bruford on drums. Bruford brought a jazz sensibility to the drum kit,
incorporating lots of swing and syncopation into his rhythms without ever
losing sight of the core backbeat, while Squire plays his bass like a lead
guitar and in the higher registers, as would become his trademark. It’s
fitting that the first sound we hear on Yes is Squire’s trebly bass (how’s
that for an oxymoron?), belting out a booming monotone line before Bruford
enters and kicks things into gear--after all, Squire would become the
band’s only constant member, and through all the personnel changes, it has
been his bedrock bass playing that has provided the familiar foundation for
everyone else who would pass through Yes’s membership through the years to
build upon. In fact, the only Yes-related project not to include Squire,
1989’s eponymous album by Anderson Bruford Wakeman Howe, goes a long way
toward showing just how vital Squire is to both the sound and structure of
Yes’s music; he is painfully visible through his absence.
It’s hard to believe that the same band that made this humble album of
largely unassuming, folksy harmonic jazz-rock would be writing complex
album-side epics just three short years later, yet the roots of those later
exploratory pieces can be heard here as well, most notably in the
two-minute-plus lead-off to the album’s closing piece, "Survival." On this
track, Squire introduces a theme that will eventually be repeated by all
four of the instrument players in unison. This opening theme then dissolves
into some gentle electric guitar strumming and delicate acoustic
accompaniment by Peter Banks, leading into Anderson’s opening lines. The
opening theme finally reappears to close out the song and the album some
four minutes later.
But the greatest musical highlight on Yes comes during the introduction to
the Beatles’ "Every Little Thing." In the early days, Yes built a
reputation on the English touring circuit for taking other artists’ songs
and drastically reworking them, sometimes so much that the end result was
basically an original Yes composition with only the lyrics remaining from
the song they covered. Paul Simon’s "America," which Yes recorded in 1972
and first released on a 1975 compilation album, Yesterdays, is the most
successful example. In the case of "Every Little Thing," though, everything
after the intro remains quite faithful to the original Beatles piece, but
the opening is, unquestionably, pure Yes. Here, two crashing full-band
notes send us quickly downshifting into a powerful chugging freight train
of a rhythm from Squire and Bruford. The temperature cools off briefly with
Banks offering some jazzy noodling over the top of the bass and drums, but
in just a few seconds the intensity of his guitar builds, propelling
everything back into high speed … and then, again without any warning,
Banks leads the band into an instrumental version of the original Beatles
melody, the intensity dissipates, and Banks sneaks in the riff from "Day
Tripper" just before Anderson begins singing the original Beatles tune.
The other cover song on the album, the Byrds’ "I See You," is most notable
for its middle instrumental section, where Banks adds yet more jazz
stylings over Bruford’s fast-paced shuffle rhythm before a crescendo of
sextuplets on the snare drum leads to a short interlude of alternating
slashing chords and guitar licks--very much like the chords/licks
alternation leading out of the free-form section of Led Zeppelin’s "Whole
Lotta Love"! Had Yes been listening to Zeppelin, or Zeppelin to Yes, or was
it just a freak coincidence?
Anyone familiar at all with Yes knows that it’s a tough job to try to
interpret many of Anderson’s cryptic lyrics. Anderson himself has said that
he often writes lyrics more for the sound of the words than for any
concrete meaning. On the other hand, sometimes it’s obvious that Anderson
is singing in some vague manner about love, hope, or spiritualism, in a
context that’s mysterious and/or open-ended enough that the listener can
work from the core of the message and assign the greater set of lyrics just
about any meaning he’d like to. In this sense, Anderson makes the Yes
experience an enjoyably interactive one--the words can engage our active
minds as much as the music does. But, on some unfortunate occasions,
Anderson does like to try his hand at more straightforward songs or, worse,
social commentary--unfortunate, because Anderson’s strength is obviously in
the world of the abstract; when he does try to be literal, and his lyrics
thus take a more prosaic turn, he usually (but not always) ends up sounding
forced and, to be frank, rather silly. Take "Sweetness" as the worst
offender from the first album: "She brings the sunshine to a rainy
afternoon/She puts the sweetness in, stirs it with a spoon." Ugh! And all
of this done in a sort of laid-back, lounge lizard style. "Harold Land"
doesn’t fare much better, as Anderson goes for the by-then well-worn ’60s
theme of war protest: "In the mud in coldness dark he’d shiver out his
fear/What disappointing sights he’d seen instead of ones so dear." Yikes.
This type of wordsmithing clearly reveals a very young Anderson who hasn’t
yet perfected the abstract style in which he would later excel.
Indeed, the best moments come on Yes when the lyrics appear to mean
absolutely nothing at all. On the opener, "Beyond and Before," we hear
Anderson, Squire, and Banks singing in a gorgeous, soaring three-part
harmony about something that may have to do with coldness and wintertime,
but the real meaning is, in the traditional Yes spirit, anyone’s guess.
Ironically, even though the cryptic nature of the lyrics here would
foreshadow Anderson’s writing style in the years to come, Anderson had
nothing to do with the lyrics on "Beyond and Before"--it was a piece
written by Squire and Clive Bailey, a bandmate of Squire’s in Mabel Greer’s
Toyshop, the band that evolved into Yes. In any event, this obscurity of
meaning is seen, here and in the years to come, to work to Yes’s advantage:
Since the words don’t really draw attention to themselves, the listener can
take the emphasis off the words, if he chooses, and focus on what’s always
been most important in Yes: the music. When the lyrics are seemingly
nonsense strings of words, and sometimes they truly are, the voice or
voices singing them open themselves to being just another instrument in the
band and as a result do not distract the listener from the amazing
musicianship lying beneath them.
The one member not yet mentioned here is Tony Kaye. That’s due to his input
on piano and organ being largely inconsequential to the album’s makeup.
He’s a competent enough player, but his organ fills are nothing
spectacular; he plays the part of the generic rock keyboard accompanist
very well, for what it’s worth. That said, though, his one "showcase" on
this album, the opening to "Looking Around," is indeed a tasty little
Hammond riff. Nothing earth-shattering, but certainly enjoyable.
In summary, this is a pleasant little album that’s probably most
interesting as a historical relic--it shows the very innocent, unassuming
roots of what was to become one of the biggest bands of the 1970s. And in
many ways, this album is more noteworthy than some of its bloated ’70s Yes
counterparts--here we have five young guys simply playing their hearts out,
without the distractions of fame, fan expectations, and record-company
demands altering the music in any way; it’s an album of well-crafted, if
unpolished, musicianship without the pretentiousness and unchecked
self-indulgence that would come to an ugly peak with Tales from Topographic
Oceans a few years down the road.
Close Window
YesInThePress.com
For site comments, inquiries, corrections, or additions, contact yitp@yesservices.com
|
|